TDCAA Community
Reasonable suspicion for defective headlight stop

This topic can be found at:
https://tdcaa.infopop.net/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/157098965/m/1211030012

September 16, 2010, 10:19
David Holmes
Reasonable suspicion for defective headlight stop
Have a case where the reason for stop is defective headlight. The stop happens to be six minutes after the statutory definition of "nighttime" expires (just before sunrise). For suppression purposes, Judge wants to know if officer can stop for defective headlight during a time of day where headlights are not required. Can anybody shed any light on this? Pun intended.

David Holmes
ACA - Hill County
September 16, 2010, 10:59
John Greenwood
I have never found any case law that shed any light on the subject, but have successfully argued in the trial court that even in broad daylight, when an officer sees a vehicle operated with one headlamp out, they know that the vehicle "is not equipped in a manner that complies with vehicle equipment standards . . .," an offense under Sec. 547.004. Maybe your case will go up on appeal and enlighten us all.
September 16, 2010, 11:30
David Holmes
Thank you for the insight.

David Holmes
ACA - Hill County
November 26, 2013, 17:00
e sainz
so, David, what was the outcome? I looked on lexis and didn't find anything and have a very similar fact pattern on a motion to suppress.