TDCAA Community
HELP! 481.103(d) and tetrahydocannabinol

This topic can be found at:
https://tdcaa.infopop.net/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/157098965/m/4167029516

February 14, 2017, 09:16
T. McMillian
HELP! 481.103(d) and tetrahydocannabinol
I have a defense attorney who had filed a pre-trial Writ of Habeas Corpus seeking relief from fundamentally defective indictment for failure to state an offense. She is basically saying that since the drugs Marinol and Syndros have been approved by the FDA, then possession of tetrahydocannabinol has been decriminalized in the same way Adderall was by 481.103 (d). Has anyone else seen this? Does anyone have any advice? Thanks in advance!
February 14, 2017, 11:45
Martin Peterson
If the substance can be proved to be dronabinol, then maybe the defense can be proven. Otherwise, the best that can be said is that one of the multitude of THC substances listed in Pen Gr 2 can no longer result in a conviction under the CSA.
June 12, 2018, 11:26
KMcD
Hi there! What was the outcome on this? We are having a slew of these filed in Kendall.


Katherine McDaniel
June 12, 2018, 13:43
T. McMillian
My chemist was able to distinguish between Marinol and the THC contained in the chocolate rice krispy treat my defendant was caught with, which was derived from a plant. The judge found in my favor and the defendant pleaded guilty shortly thereafter.