TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Civil    Constable-Elect that is ineligible to serve
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Constable-Elect that is ineligible to serve Login/Join 
Member
posted
Here's my situation:

Constable-elect, who was duly elected and is to be sworn in on January 1, 2009, is not statutorily eligible to serve as constable.

Anyone know what is supposed to happen procedurally at this point? If there is a way that I can keep him from being sworn in, that will save me the trouble of filing a removal action afterward. Who determines whether he can be sworn? BTW, my County Judge wants to swear him in.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
 
Posts: 50 | Registered: July 08, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I do not have an answer for you. But since misery loves company, I thought you would like to know that I have nearly the same issue. The only difference is that I do not know if our Constable-elect is or is not qualified. He appears to have no interest in providing the County any information about himself or his qualifications.
 
Posts: 261 | Location: Lampasas, Texas, USA | Registered: November 29, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
Member
posted Hide Post
In what way is he ineligible?
 
Posts: 2423 | Location: TDCAA | Registered: March 08, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As required to be eligible to serve as constable -He does not have at least an associate's degree, he is not a special investigator under Art. 2.122(a), he is not an honorably retired peace officer, nor is he an active or inactive licensed peace officer. At least he has not offered any evidence of any of these qualifications, even though requested.

I know what to do on the 270th day, but how are the requirements under local gov. code 86.0021(a) enforced?

[This message was edited by John Greenwood on 12-15-08 at .]

[This message was edited by John Greenwood on 12-15-08 at .]
 
Posts: 261 | Location: Lampasas, Texas, USA | Registered: November 29, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If a constable is legally unqualified to hold the office, the proper remedy is a quo warranto suit to oust the unlawful officeholder. That is true before or after the 270-day deadline, though the cause of action before the deadline must focus on qualifications other than licensure/presentation of evidence of licensure as a peace officer.
 
Posts: 1233 | Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA | Registered: March 15, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thanks Scott,

I was hung-up on quo warranto being the specified removal remedy for failure to obtain a license and the lack of a specified remedy for not having the qualifications to serve in the first place. It appears that becasue he is not eligible for office, as oposed to subject to removal, he could be fined under Chapter 66. Maybe this will change his mind about being sworn in.
 
Posts: 261 | Location: Lampasas, Texas, USA | Registered: November 29, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
appears i may have the same issue.....Where did you find the potential fine?
Thanks
 
Posts: 568 | Registered: November 14, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Civil Practice and Remedies 66.003(3) -
"may fine the person for usurping, intruding into, or unlawfully holding and executing the office or franchise."
 
Posts: 261 | Location: Lampasas, Texas, USA | Registered: November 29, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
So, what happened in your counties with your ineligible constables? Did they take office?
 
Posts: 341 | Location: Tarrant County, Texas | Registered: August 24, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Civil    Constable-Elect that is ineligible to serve

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.