TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Juvenile Law    quick sealing Q
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
quick sealing Q Login/Join 
Member
posted
Court-ordered DPA on an Indecency in 2009, which juvenile successfully completed w/no later involvement with LE. He's now 19 and filed a motion to seal. Internal discussions about interpreting 58.003 lead me to believe he's eligible, but I was thrown by the sex offense, which seems like it should matter but apparently doesn't.

Can a juvie guru please advise whether my interpretation is correct? Thanks in advance!
 
Posts: 35 | Location: Weatherford, TX | Registered: March 28, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think he is eligible if there was no adjudication of delinquency. See 58.003(d)
(I am assuming that "DPA" is a deferred prosecution - I'm suprised the court ordered it on such and offense)
 
Posts: 113 | Location: Houston, Texas,USA | Registered: October 30, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Juvenile Law    quick sealing Q

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.