TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Juvenile Law    Voir Dire Examination
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Voir Dire Examination Login/Join 
Member
posted
I will have a jury trial in a juvenile case next week. This is my first as a prosecutor, and I am trying to prepare for voir dire.

I think that the juvenile's contention is that the two eyewitnesses that I have to his criminal mischief were also involved in the criminal mischief. My question is, do I need to go into what it takes to be a party to a crime during voir dire, or is this going to needlessly confuse the jury?

I am proceeding under the theory that the juvenile is the only actor involved, but I do not want the jury to be sidetracked by arguments that he should not be adjudicated because the other two are not charged as well.
 
Posts: 363 | Location: Plainview, Hale County | Registered: January 11, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I don't think I would voir dire parties if he was the actual actor. I agree with your thought that it would be too confusing.

I would file a motion in liminie to keep the defense from mentioning whether the other two were charged. After all that is confidential info under the family code, not to mention totally irrelevant to this respondent.
 
Posts: 640 | Location: Longview, Texas | Registered: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Juvenile Law    Voir Dire Examination

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.