TDCAA Community
DMN Article on Manslaughter

This topic can be found at:
https://tdcaa.infopop.net/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/157098965/m/1041049802

August 15, 2010, 08:19
JB
DMN Article on Manslaughter
You drink. You drive. You go to jail.

That's what the billboards say.

But in Dallas County, a leader in alcohol-fueled traffic deaths, you may spend little or no time behind bars - even if you kill someone.

More than 40 percent of those arrested for intoxication manslaughter over the last 10 years never saw a prison cell. Instead, they got probation.

Details.
August 15, 2010, 22:13
Brent Robbins
QUITE the story. Can't wait for parts 2 and 3...
August 16, 2010, 08:47
JB
Details.
August 17, 2010, 08:26
JB
Details.
August 17, 2010, 08:29
JB
Despite thousands of words and substantial research, seems that there is still little recognition that it is a CRIME to get in a car and drive it after you are intoxicated. The focus remains on the intoxication and the diseases connected to the decision to drink excessively.

I get that. And the criminal justice system gets that. There are plenty of tools, for those that want them, to focus on dealing with the disease.

The crime exists not because of the alcoholism. It exists because of the deliberate choice to get in the car and drive, endangering innocent people. Even after a death occurs, there is ambivalence toward punishment.

All the treatment in the world won't fix that.
August 17, 2010, 09:04
rk
Drunken Driver Gets 60 years
August 17, 2010, 11:18
rob kepple
I agree with JB. It was almost amusing to read the article which stated that "get tough" hasn't worked. Really, has the Texas policy really been to get tough? I am not convinced that ALR and the surcharge, programs which have acted in practice to interfere with our ability to do the job, we haven't truly seen a "get tough" policy from the state.

We would all like to treat people with alcohol problems with a view to avoiding repeat DWI's. Makes sense. But in the end, isn't it a DRIVING problem that we seek to address? And can't the prospect of no DL (without automatic occupationals) and harsh punishment deter the conduct?
August 18, 2010, 08:05
JB
Much of the difficulty associated with DWI cases is related to process. A high rate of BT refusals leaves prosecutors with less evidence than needed to negotiate. The absence of deferred adjudication creates a need for creative charge bargaining. A leaky DL system (if you want an ODL, you get it), puts the D right back in a car.

The addition of mandatory blood samples for felony cases has already made a huge difference in prosecuting repeat offenders. Expand that mandatory blood to all DWI's. Restore deferred adjudication (with the ability to use it as a conviction for repeat offenders) and take away ODL for repeat offenders, making sure that everyone else has an interlock device.

Then, leave the system alone for a few years (that may be the hardest part for the Leg) and watch caseloads go down, trials diminish, and real progress begin.
August 18, 2010, 13:07
rob kepple
Bingo.
August 19, 2010, 16:33
Sherri Tibbe
This Defendant had no criminal history, but the jury felt the fact that someone had died warranted a prison sentence.
See article below. Hopefully the link will work, I've never done this before1


Two years after the fatal wreck that claimed the life of 25-year-old Rebecca Ann Stuckey, the drunk driver who killed her has been sentenced to 15 years in prison.

A Hays County jury deliberated less than 30 minutes before convicting Austin resident Miranda Martinez, 24, of intoxication manslaughter.



Read more at the Hays Free Press http://haysfreepress.com/archives/8850#ixzz0x5d9UGNI
August 19, 2010, 17:00
JB
Congratulations on posting your first link!
August 20, 2010, 13:52
Sherri Tibbe
Thanks JB, a proud moment!
August 23, 2010, 10:37
Shannon Edmonds
As a reward for your hard work, I've posted the article on the main page as well.

http://www.tdcaa.com/node/7067