TDCAA Community
Criminal Interdiction

This topic can be found at:
https://tdcaa.infopop.net/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/157098965/m/6281023812

February 23, 2011, 23:20
RockAustin
Criminal Interdiction
Does being in uniform and aboard a passenger bus (on a traffic stop not at bus depot) to conduct a consentual encounter warrant a seizure?

Roque F. Martinez
February 24, 2011, 02:59
Gretchen
I have read your post 7-8 times and the only thing I can think that you are asking is whether a uniformed officer can get on a bus at a bus stop as a rider like any other in order to engage in consensual encounters with people on the bus, and then base a detention on the conversations and observations resulting from those encounters. Is that your question?

Because if you're asking whether an officer can make a traffic stop to engage in a consensual encounter to justify a seizure, your question makes no sense.
February 24, 2011, 14:25
Versel
Actually, this looks like a question from a member of the general public seeking legal advice as opposed to a member of the legal community using this board.
February 24, 2011, 14:27
Gretchen
The only reason I responded was because the user has a City of Austin email address and ID's himself as a police officer in his profile. Otherwise, I would agree with you, V.
February 24, 2011, 15:20
GG
Anyone can put anything in a profile. His question makes no sense for a PO to be asking.
February 24, 2011, 16:03
Gretchen
I agree about the question...but I just confirmed he's for real.
March 18, 2011, 00:22
RockAustin
sorry for the confusion.

I am doing some research trying to find case law in reference to the subject of PASSENGER BUS CRIMINAL INTERDICTION.

I want to know what people think about this situation:

Officer makes a traffic stop on a passenger bus, on a public roadway. Officer asks bus driver for CONSENT to speak to the passengers. CONSENT is granted. Officer enters the bus and makes consentual contact with 1,2, or 3 passengers to investigate criminal activity. 50% say NO GO because officer is uniform and 50% say GOOD TO GO as long as its CONSENTUAL, PERSON SHOULD KNOW THEY ARE FREE TO GO.

Roque F. Martinez
March 18, 2011, 04:28
John A. Stride
This subject, including the principal authorities, is addressed in TDCAA's Warrantless Search and Seizure Manual (2008) pp. 127-28.