Court-ordered DPA on an Indecency in 2009, which juvenile successfully completed w/no later involvement with LE. He's now 19 and filed a motion to seal. Internal discussions about interpreting 58.003 lead me to believe he's eligible, but I was thrown by the sex offense, which seems like it should matter but apparently doesn't.

Can a juvie guru please advise whether my interpretation is correct? Thanks in advance!

I think he is eligible if there was no adjudication of delinquency. See 58.003(d)
(I am assuming that "DPA" is a deferred prosecution - I'm suprised the court ordered it on such and offense)