Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
Court-ordered DPA on an Indecency in 2009, which juvenile successfully completed w/no later involvement with LE. He's now 19 and filed a motion to seal. Internal discussions about interpreting 58.003 lead me to believe he's eligible, but I was thrown by the sex offense, which seems like it should matter but apparently doesn't. Can a juvie guru please advise whether my interpretation is correct? Thanks in advance! | ||
|
Member |
I think he is eligible if there was no adjudication of delinquency. See 58.003(d) (I am assuming that "DPA" is a deferred prosecution - I'm suprised the court ordered it on such and offense) | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.