TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Other    Standardized Judgments and Computers
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Standardized Judgments and Computers Login/Join 
Member
posted
Our office is trying to use the standardized judgments from the Office of Court Administration. Can someone more computer literate than I am tell me how to make additions or ammendments to these forms? In particular, I want to add conditions of probation, but the stupid form won't let me. And I'm supposed to be the computer guru in my office. Makes you realize we do lots of work with pens and legal pads, doesn't it? :-)
 
Posts: 77 | Location: Nacogdoches County, Texas | Registered: April 01, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Now, be careful about cussing out an inanimate object. Those forms have feelings, too.

The forms are offered in two formats: PDF files (which can't be changed because you essentially get a permanent image) and Word files (which can be changed if you unlock the document).

You can unlock the document under the Tools menu by choosing "Unprotect." In addition, the document may be locked under the Properties function. Simply choose unlock.

Then you can edit, save and relock the document. You also could call the office of court administration and talk to the very nice lady who formatted these nice forms. I bet, if you were very nice, she would walk you through any changes. Just tell her I referred you to her.

Good luck.
 
Posts: 7860 | Location: Georgetown, Texas | Registered: January 25, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Stephanie: I unprotected the Order Imposing Conditions of CS form (on the tools menu), then saved 4 versions for use with different types of cases. There is (1)a basic form with conditions for non-drug, non-sex, non-assaultive offenses, (2) a form for DWI and other drug related offenses, (3) a form for sex offenses, and (4) a form with EVERY condition we could think of called "all" that we use for unusual cases (e.g. sex offender +drugs). This makes preparation and editing more efficient since we start with a form that has most or all of the conditions that we usually impose for a specific offense. I also set the forms up with file names ending with "Drug", "Sex", "Basic" and "All" so its easy to see which one to use, and formatted so that the paragraphs automatically re-number when we add or delete a condition.

One more note - be CAREFUL when changing the document to "protect" or "unprotect" - ALWAYS save before making that change or you can lose your changes.

E-mail me if you need anything else.

Frank Lacy
 
Posts: 47 | Location: Fort Stockton, Texas USA | Registered: April 04, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thank you, John and Frank! I guess I could have spent a few hours researching articles on the MS website to find this answer. (Who am I kidding? I could have spent a few day before I figured out that the document was protected.) Looks like my homework this weekend will be working on the conditions of community supervision.
 
Posts: 77 | Location: Nacogdoches County, Texas | Registered: April 01, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Okay, I have gotten the new forms from TJ online.

We did some modifications.

All is well, but . . .

In our old forms we placed the verdict form in the judgement:

"We, the jury, find the defendant , ---- guilty of the offense of ---- on or about the ----, as alleged in the indictment".

___signed________
Foreperson of the Jury

Does / did anyone else do this?

Do the new forms cover this, or should we modify further?
 
Posts: 956 | Location: Cherokee County, Rusk, Tx | Registered: July 11, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The statute stills says the verdict should be entered on the minutes of the court. art. 37.04 CCP. But the new form seems to comply with 42.01 (7) and my guess is the foreman would prefer not to have his or her name memorialized. Exactly how the verdict should be spread on the minutes was never very clear to me. But, a direct quote in the judgment does not seem to be the only way to comply with 37.04.
 
Posts: 2347 | Registered: February 07, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I converted the Word state forms to a Word merge format that is degree and offense specific. It works far superior to the state forms. They also include all the warnings, waivers, confession, suspension and destruction orders appropriate for the offense.

The secretaries gripe all the time about the few forms that I didn't change because they are so much more difficult to use.

If you have about 5 or 6 weeks to spare it is worth the effort.
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Wichita Falls, Texas | Registered: May 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Other    Standardized Judgments and Computers

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.