TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Appellate    Georgia v. Randolph argmt in SCOTUS
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Georgia v. Randolph argmt in SCOTUS Login/Join 
Member
posted
Sounds as if the oral argument was a close call in the common authority/consent to search case. Any idea which way it will go? What would be your position if you shared a residence and objected to the search but police entered based on the consent of your partner?

http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/11/yesterdays_argu.html#more
 
Posts: 532 | Location: McKinney, Tx | Registered: June 22, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
What about basic property law? In this case, H and W have equal right to the property. That means they have equal right to invite another on the property, i.e. the police. Tie goes to the searcher. This is a reasonable search for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment.
 
Posts: 2137 | Location: McKinney, Texas, USA | Registered: February 15, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
My opinion: the common areas under joint control could be searched with consent obtained from either co-occupant. The private areas/objects, such as a separate closet, separate bedrooom, briefcase, purse, etc. would require consent by the person who occupied the closet or bedroom or owned the briefcase or purse.
 
Posts: 1029 | Location: Fort Worth, TX | Registered: June 25, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Appellate    Georgia v. Randolph argmt in SCOTUS

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.