TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Appellate    PDR or Motion for Rehearing?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
PDR or Motion for Rehearing? Login/Join 
Member
posted
Is there any advantage/disadvantage to filing a motion for rehearing before filing a petition for discretionary review? Similarly, is there any prohibition against filing both at the same time, or would that be counter-productive?
 
Posts: 622 | Location: San Marcos | Registered: November 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Preparing a motion for rehearing can really help in refining your PDR. Deadlines are what you need to watch--if you file a MFR that's just one more deadline. I don't know of any downside to filing a MFR--although personally I have never had any luck with them. Why file them at the same time? The COA will get the message that you are unhappy with its decision when you file the MFR. Just bide your time and, when it is denied, file the PDR. The PDR will be premature when filed with the MFR. If you don't want to delay things, go straight to a PDR. The COA can act on that just like MFR, if it has second thoughts about its opinion. Good luck.
JAS
 
Posts: 586 | Location: Denton,TX | Registered: January 08, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
MFR is really for those cases in which the court of appeals really, really got it wrong and should be given an opportunity to fix it before a higher court gets involved. I realize a PDR creates the opportunity for the same, but I doubt it gets the same attention by the court.

More likely to work though is the MFR en banc. That sends a message that the case is so bad that the rest of the judges should pay attention and fix it before they are all embarrassed by a PDR.

MFR should be rare. MFR en banc should be very rare. If not, then they will be ignored.

Best moment I ever had on appeal was winning a MFR en banc (murder case with life sentence) following reversal for alleged fundamental error and then watching the opposing PDR get denied.
 
Posts: 7860 | Location: Georgetown, Texas | Registered: January 25, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Have the rules changed about the tolling of deadlines? I know it used to be that if you filed a Motion for Rehearing that tolled your deadline to file a PDR, but filing a Motion for Reconsideration En Banc did not. It wasn't changed in the proposed rules, and I didn't see if the final rules eliminated that distinction.
 
Posts: 1243 | Location: houston, texas, u.s.a. | Registered: October 19, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Rule 68.2 continues to refer only to "the last timely motion for rehearing" as a triggering event. Thus, a Rule 49.7 motion does not appear to act as a motion for rehearing, to me. Why would you not always file both motions? It seems to me the panel is always more likely to reverse directions than expecting a bunch of judges outside the panel to come in and redo the case.
 
Posts: 2368 | Registered: February 07, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
That's what I thought, but I wanted to be sure. On those occassions when I've filed a motion for rehearing, I've also filed a motion for reconsideration en banc as an additional motion. (Of course, the first time I did that was on a case that had been transferred to the Sixth Court of Appeals, which I believe only has three judges. Ah well, live and learn. Everyone as the Court was very nice about it.)

[This message was edited by David Newell on 01-08-09 at .]
 
Posts: 1243 | Location: houston, texas, u.s.a. | Registered: October 19, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
No doubt your motion for reconsideration en banc met with success. Wink
 
Posts: 2368 | Registered: February 07, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Indeed, that is one way of looking at it. (And in defense of me, I did turn an unfavorable published opinion into a favorable unpublished one with my motion, so it wasn't all bad. Perhaps they took pity on me.)

[This message was edited by David Newell on 01-11-09 at .]
 
Posts: 1243 | Location: houston, texas, u.s.a. | Registered: October 19, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Appellate    PDR or Motion for Rehearing?

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.