Up to now Judge Per Curiam has carefully concealed his/her identity. But that does not seem to be true in Allen, No. 02-02-309-CR (9/02/04), where the following appears:
"PER CURIAM
PANEL F: DAUPHINOT, LIVINGSTON, and MCCOY, JJ.
LIVINGSTON, J. concurs without opinion
MCCOY, J. concurs without opinion"

In that situation, why is the opinion issued "per curiam"?