Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
Appellate Challenge--cartoon brief (in Appellate) by David Newell I sometimes wish I could just submit a PowerPoint.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
You Can't Make This Up (in Criminal) by David NewellLlama llama red pajama stop all this llama drama.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
You Can't Make This Up (in Criminal) by David NewellWhilst playing a banjo.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Miller v Alabama (in Criminal) by David Newell"Next term look for the Court to decide that juvenile offenders cannot be sent to their room without...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
A.P. Merillat (in Criminal) by David NewellYou are a good and honorable man, A.P. Just keep pickin' and a grinnin'.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
SCOTUS: Confrontation cl NOT violated (in Appellate) by David NewellI actually long for the days of Ohio v. Roberts. Thanks Tony. But does this make anything worse? ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
SCOTUS: Confrontation cl NOT violated (in Appellate) by David NewellIf only it were that simple . . .... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Nontesting Experts (in Criminal) by David NewellI think so because her opinion would be sufficiently independent rather than a mere scrivener under ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Manner and Means Unknown post Sanchez (in Criminal) by David NewellI actually scanned through the opinion to see if I could find the word "unknowable" in the opinion b...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellA victory for justice and common sense! ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellHey, I don't want to be arguing for a retroactive application. And I agree, just because a few cour...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellDon't know that it is as they jettisoned Ohio v. Roberts or part of it in Crawford. In Padilla they...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellAre we really depending on Verrilli? Do we need an organized effort to file amicus . . . amicuses ....... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellWhat Court have you been watching? SCOTUS doesn't do that. They throw things out and tell the stat...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellWow. I thought it was a closer call than that. If this weren't funneled through the well-establish...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
"WEASEL WORDS" IN FOF (in Appellate) by David NewellThat's going to be a thing, isn't it? Is stating the officer's belief was objectively reasonable a ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Frog is a DW (in Criminal) by David NewellHas a frog actually been held to be a deadly weapon? Not in the way that the frog has been held, but...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Exit only (in Criminal) by David NewellSteve Martin wrote ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 63 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
