Member
| In a small community, such as CC where the person is well known, ignoring the report may be feasible -- depending upon the nature of the report. A certain caution may be proper, but dispatch may well be familiar with the person and recognize a call that would be out of the ordinary. As John suggested, civil commitment is an option, though the current standard (mental illness and either dangerousness to self, to others or the deterioration standard) is a little tougher than it might be if one bill is passed changing the 3rd standard to that oft used of being "gravely disabled." The option of reliance upon charges and jail - and a possible competency examination plus treatment to the tune of $38k per episode according to DSHS, exclusive of the bed days locally, gets a bit expensive. Many have said - only partially in jest -- that it would be cheaper to put the person in a Holiday Inn! We have few, or no, work camps - or for that matter -- locations for extended,i.e. long-term, treatment of the chronically mentally ill. Our problem in the city is that many of our frequent fliers actually seek confinement, e.g. to see the dentist, replace eye glasses, for comfort when it is cold, etc. etc. Consequently, what we think of as "sanction" arn't sanctions but reinforcers. A work program would be far the better! |
| Posts: 264 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: January 17, 2005 |
IP
|
|