Court Mulls Death Penalty for Child Rape

By MARK SHERMAN
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON � The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether a state can execute someone convicted of raping a child, one of the few remaining crimes that does not require the death of the victim to result in capital punishment.

Patrick Kennedy, 43, was sentenced to death for the rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter in Louisiana. He is one of two people in the United States, both in Louisiana, who have been condemned to death for a rape that was not also accompanied by a killing.

The Supreme Court banned executions for rape in 1977 in a case in which the victim was an adult woman.

Kennedy's lawyers say the death penalty for child rape violates the Eighth Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment.

The justices were scheduled to hear arguments in the case in April.

The last executions for rape or any other crime that did not include a victim's death were in 1964.

Forty-five states ban the death penalty for any kind of rape, and the other five states allow it for child rapists. Kennedy's case is the only time a state has sought to execute someone. Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas allow executions in such cases.

The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the sentence. "Our state legislature and this court have determined this category of aggravated rapist to be among those deserving of the death penalty, and short of first-degree murder, we can think of no other non-homicide crime more deserving," Justice Jeffrey Victory wrote.

Chief Justice Pascal Calogero dissented, saying that with the possible exception of espionage or treason, "the Eighth Amendment precludes capital punishment for any offense that does not involve the death of the victim."

The child rape case is the second capital punishment case from Louisiana this term at the Supreme Court. The justices already are considering whether a prosecutor improperly excluded blacks from a jury and then inflamed the all-white panel with references to the O.J. Simpson case.

In addition, the court is weighing whether the way Kentucky executes prisoners by lethal injection � procedures similar to those used in three dozen states � violates the Constitution.

Kennedy was convicted in 2003 of raping his stepdaughter at their home in suburban New Orleans. The girl initially told police she was sorting Girl Scout cookies in the garage when two boys assaulted her.

Police arrested Kennedy a couple of weeks after the March 1998 rape, but more than 20 months passed before the girl identified him as her attacker.

His defense attorney at the time argued that blood testing was inconclusive and that the victim was pressured to change her story.

Kennedy's Supreme Court lawyers also pointed out that Kennedy is black and that nearly 90 percent of people executed for rape in the United States were black. "This court should pause before condoning a practice so heavily tinged with the scourge of racism," said Stanford University law professor Jeffrey Fisher, Kennedy's lead lawyer.

The state said the court should turn down the case because Louisiana law is narrowly tailored to apply only to people convicted of raping children younger than 12.

Last month, jurors in Caddo Parish, which includes Shreveport, sentenced Richard Davis, 35, to death for repeatedly raping a 5-year-old girl. Before their deliberations, local prosecutor Lea Hall told jurors: "Execute this man. Justice has a sword and this sword needs to swing today."

The case being considered by the Supreme Court is Kennedy v. Louisiana, 07-343.

Anyone taking odds on the outcome? Just a guess, but "evolving standards of decency" would suggest execution for rape is disproportionate.

JAS

[This message was edited by JAS on 01-07-08 at .]

I agree.

The Louisiana law permits death as a punishment for one act of sexual assault against a child.

Assuming SCOTUS strikes it down in a limited opinion that is restricted to that statute, what are y'all's thoughts on the application of that ban to Texas' new Jessica's Law, which requires a prior conviction for sexual assault of a child before an offender is eligible for the death penalty on a second offense?

This is all very speculative, but my guess is that "no" will mean "no," and that even a limited opinion will include strong dicta in the majority or cc opinions extending the ban to statutes like the new J's Law. But never say never ...

As you suggest, a SCOTUS opinion may not reach the other statutes but the Court will probably be clear enough that the other statutes you mention will be rendered toothless. Either way, in the present climate, I fear they will all fall. But I don't mind being wrong.

JAS