Member
| "The trial court admitted the evidence under the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule because the warrant check indicated that appellant had an outstanding warrant for his arrest. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 38.23 (Vernon 2005) (exclusionary rule and good faith exception). We agree. The exclusionary rule does not apply in cases in which an arresting officer is reasonably acting upon information provided to him even if that information is later determined to be erroneous. Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995); State v. Mayorga, 901 S.W.2d 943, 945 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); see also Article 38.23(b); Dunn v. State, 951 S.W.2d 478, 479 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). Officer Davidson was acting in objective, good faith reliance upon dispatch's information that an outstanding arrest warrant existed. Thus, the evidence was properly admitted. Appellant's second issue is overruled."
Thompson v. State, NO. 11-07-00093-CR, 2008 WL 4440436 at *2 (Tex.App.-Eastland October 02, 2008, no pet.) (not published) |
| Posts: 527 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas, | Registered: May 23, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| Here's a link to the thread discussing Herring. Note also that if this is an erroneous dispatch case, the San Antonio Court of Appeals seems to have applied the good faith exception to that circumstance in White v. State, 989 S.W.2d 108. [This message was edited by David Newell on 04-08-09 at .] |
| Posts: 1243 | Location: houston, texas, u.s.a. | Registered: October 19, 2001 |
IP
|
|