Ard v, State: The first sentence says that the circumstances "did establish custody" and then it says it did not show custody. I assume a "not" was accidentally left out.

It has been corrected. The "not" has been added. Good going.

Thanks for the catch, eagle eye!

If you can believe it, I actually got a call from a very helpful prosecutor who doesn't even live in Texas about my typo on the front page. My story is I was just seeing who was paying attention. And I'm sticking with that story.