Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Defendant motion court to reduce charge when the Officers report shows all elements of TC 545.421 present but Prosecution charged PC 38.04. It appears that on appeal the courts have ruled that TC is not a lesser offense of PC but then it would seem that the TC requires more elements be proven then the PC code. Can that be right? When defendant was not speeding or driving recklessly but failed to stop immediately and contends he stopped upon awareness that officer was attempting to stop him. How do you handle this? | ||
|
Member |
Point out that the State gets to decide what it wants to charge, and the defendant can ask for a lesser included offense instruction at trial? | |||
|
Member |
Which, from the prior posting history, seems like is the poster as the defendant... | |||
|
Member |
Welcome to the TDCAA Bulletin Boards. The discussions in these user forums are for the benefit of prosecutors and their staff members, although we welcome relevant and appropriate input from other members of the criminal justice and government lawyer community. The opinions expressed on this forum are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of TDCAA, its staff, or any other member of the association. These forums are NOT a source of legal advice for citizens. Call the State Bar of Texas (800/204-2222) for information on seeking legal advice. | |||
|
Member |
I am researching appeals decisions. Opinions seem split on whether TC is lesser included of PC due to the additional elements of TC offense. I thought someone might be able to answer why TC would require more elements be charged then the PC code when PC is the felony. Thats all. My post regards defendats who have filed appeals for example PEAVEY v. STATE No. 03-06-00342-CR. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.