Member
| Technically, when a defendant pleads guilty, it becomes a unitary proceeding instead of a bifurcated one. There is no "guilt phase" and "punishment phase", because you're not deciding on guilt. If the defendant pleads guilty to the judge, then everything both sides put on is punishment evidence, and the judge can sentence the defendant to deferred if he believes it's appropriate. The only way you prevent that is by not waiving a jury.
If the defendant pleads not guilty, then you still have the traditional bifurcated trial, and you can object to all punishment evidence as not relevant to the guilt phase until the judge has actually reached a verdict on guilt. Of course, if the defendant pleads not guilty, he can't get deferred anyway. |
| Posts: 1116 | Location: Waxahachie | Registered: December 09, 2004 |
IP
|
|
Member
| If you are looking to prevent a deferred or want a jury to assess punishment, just don't sign a waiver of a jury trial. The state has an absolute right to a jury trial on guilt/innocence and mandamus will be granted if that right is not respected. See State ex rel. Turner v. McDonald, 676 S.W.2d 371. Once a jury finds the defendant guilty, they are guilty. Therefore, a deferred cannot be granted by the court. And, since the court can't give regular probation to a 3g offense, the defendant must be sentenced to pen time if they elect to go to the court for punishment. If they elect to go to the jury, the best they can get is regular probation. In addition, if they have a prior felony conviction, they are not eligible from a jury and may be prevented from getting probation from either the court or the jury. |
| Posts: 40 | Location: New Braunfels, Texas, USA | Registered: April 30, 2004 |
IP
|
|