Member
| When I was in the juvenile division in Harris County for the mercifully short time that I was there, we almost always did determinate sentencing on the sex offenders. They were always the wimpy, shy, quiet kid in school, got good grades, and never had a criminal history. But who else would you expect to diddle the 6 year old next door? We found determinate a better sentencing than the flakey,inderterminate sentencing option. Often we found that if they didn't get better and get "rehabilitated" in the TYC sex offender program, then TDCJ was as good a place as any for them when they got old enough. |
| Posts: 515 | Location: austin, tx, usa | Registered: July 02, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| I handle a lot of juvenile sex crimes. Both scenarios you have provided are typical. The most difficult cases are the ones in which a ?great kid? is really very dangerous. In many cases, however, juvenile sex offenders are very different than adult sex offenders, and there is a lot that social service providers can do to prevent long-term dangers to the community. Nobody wants to believe that a teenager did it, but your case is not as bad as it looks. If you go to trial, you will need a good expert witness. I?d be happy to talk to you about what I do in similar situations. 409-766-2364 Here is some good material from the American Prosecutors Research Institute about juvenile sex offenders and how to sort them out: http://www.ndaa.org/publications/newsletters/in_re_volume_5_number_2_2002.html |
| Posts: 18 | Location: Galveston, TX | Registered: December 12, 2003 |
IP
|
|