Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
I have a case where there is a pending motion to adjudicate a deferred probation on a state jail felony. Because the defendant has some severe special needs (competency not an issue), we want to adjudicate and punish under 12.44(b) so he does not lose his state /federal benefits. I believe this would be permissible because it is a punishment issue but cannot find anything in my research to substantiate this belief. Has anyone come across this issue or have any case law: | ||
|
Member |
Looks fine. As there has not yet been a conviction for a felony, the 12.44(b) option is still available. Can't imagine the defendant is going to complain. Just make sure the judgment reflects the conviction is for the Class A misdemeanor punishment range so that some bureaucrat doesn't cut off his benefits. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.