Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Administrator Member |
I don't subscribe to them, but I gained access to this information released today. Nothing new, actually, but still interesting. (Sorry, but the tables with the poll Q&As don't reformat correctly so I had to delete them). ------------------- June 01, 2006 Two in Three Favor Death Penalty for Convicted Murderers Public divided over death penalty or life imprisonment as better punishment by Jeffrey M. Jones GALLUP NEWS SERVICE PRINCETON, NJ -- Gallup's latest update on support for the death penalty finds most Americans continue to support the execution of convicted murderers. When given an explicit choice between the death penalty and life imprisonment with no possibility of parole, however, Americans divide evenly as to which is the better penalty for murder. Even though Americans believe innocent people have been executed in the last five years and doubt that the death penalty deters people from committing murder, most Americans believe it is applied fairly in this country and say it should be used more often. Basic Support for the Death Penalty Sixty-five percent of Americans say they favor the death penalty for convicted murderers, according to a Gallup Poll conducted May 5-7, 2006. This level of support is similar to what Gallup has found over the past three years. Since 2000, roughly two in three Americans have favored the death penalty, with two slightly higher 70% readings in May 2003 and October 2002. The current level of support is on par with what Gallup measured in the late 1970s and early 1980s, just after the death penalty was reinstated in this country. Support was higher from the mid-1980s to the late 1990s -- consistently above 70% and reaching a high of 80% in September 1994. More Americans have favored than opposed the death penalty each time this question has been asked since 1936, with just one exception. In a May 1966 Gallup poll, the public opposed the death penalty by a 47% to 42% margin. That reading came as the country was debating the legality of the death penalty. The 1972 Supreme Court ruling in Furman v. Georgia voided all state death penalty statutes. No executions took place in the United States from 1968 to 1976. In 1976 the Court ruled in Gregg v. Georgia that newly written state statutes that addressed the Court's early concerns were constitutional. Although in principle roughly two-thirds of Americans are supportive of the death penalty, they divide evenly in their preference of life imprisonment with no possibility of parole versus the death penalty as the better punishment in murder cases. Given these explicit alternatives, 47% prefer the death penalty and 48% life imprisonment. Americans have typically shown a slight preference for the death penalty on this measure -- usually just above 50%. In general, Republicans are more likely to support the death penalty than Democrats, and men are more likely to support it than women. A majority of all these groups say they favor the death penalty for those convicted of murder (84% of Republicans, 63% of independents, and 52% of Democrats; 69% of men and 61% of women). However, when given the choice of the death penalty or life imprisonment, Republicans choose the death penalty by a 64% to 31% margin, while Democrats choose life imprisonment by a 63% to 31% margin. A majority of men believe the death penalty is the better punishment for murder (56% to 39%), while a majority of women disagree and believe life imprisonment is the better option (55% to 39%). The Death Penalty in America In addition to gauging basic public support for the death penalty, Gallup routinely asks questions designed to assess the way Americans feel about some of the specific controversies associated with the death penalty. The public clearly recognizes some of the problems with the use of capital punishment in this country, but on balance still views it positively. For example, a majority of Americans, 63%, agree with critics of the death penalty that innocent people have been executed under the death penalty in recent years. Only 27% believe this has not happened in the past five years. In two previous measurements, at least 59% of Americans said they think that people have been executed for crimes they did not commit. Additionally, Americans dispute the notion, espoused by some death penalty proponents, that it deters people from committing murder. Just 34% believe it does, while 64% believe it does not. Americans' attitudes on this have changed dramatically over time -- in the 1980s and early 1990s, most Americans believed the death penalty did act as a deterrent to murder. Previous Gallup polls have shown Americans support the death penalty because they believe it provides justice ("an eye for an eye") and revenge, not because of its practical effect in deterring future murders. Despite recognizing that innocent people may have been executed, most Americans still say the death penalty is applied fairly in this country. Sixty percent say so in the most recent poll, conducted May 8-11, and a majority has held this view since Gallup first asked about it in 2000. Only about one in five Americans believe the death penalty is imposed too often. That sentiment has been consistent over the past six years. Americans are much more likely to believe that the death penalty is not imposed often enough -- 51% hold that view in the current survey, and close to half have done so since 2002. That leaves about one in four Americans who believe the death penalty is used about the right amount of time. ------------------------- Survey Methods These results are based on telephone interviews with randomly selected national samples of approximately 500 adults, aged 18 and older, conducted May 5-7 and May 8-11, 2006. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is �5 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls. | ||
|
Administrator Member |
This was released last week, but I'm unable to access the polling data .... -------------------------- May 24, 2006 Republicans, Democrats Differ on What Is Morally Acceptable Death penalty tops list of what Americans find morally acceptable by Joseph Carroll The death penalty tops the list of behaviors that Americans find morally acceptable, according to a recent Gallup Poll. Republicans find the death penalty, wearing fur clothing, and animal testing to be the most acceptable, while Democrats rate divorce, stem cell research, premarital sex, gambling, and the death penalty as most acceptable. Republicans and Democrats differ most significantly in their views of abortion and wearing fur clothing. | |||
|
Member |
Since Democrats think premarital sex is acceptable, does that mean Bill Clinton and Teddy Kennedy(Bill & Teddy's Great Adventures) must have taken part in the poll? | |||
|
Administrator Member |
I was more curious to know when fur-wearing was going to start appearing in each party's campaign platform. | |||
|
Member |
What's wrong Shannon? Didn't you know that Mink coats are the 17th most popular example or argument for or against the death penalty? Mink coats come up more often in the debate than popsicle sticks or badminton. And we both know how relevant those topics are to the discussion. What I want to know is: how do Democrats and Republicans break down on Noodling, Sherry, Banjos, and Bleach in Soft Drinks. There's just not enough research on that topic. Maybe we can petition the ACLU to host a summer camp on Polling after they finish the great Cathode Ray Tube Initiative. AP, can you get right on that? | |||
|
Member |
Stolen from the clipboard of an ACLU summer camp counselor trainee who stopped off for supplies at the Conroe Western Auto: Camp Stickittotheright Schedule of Activities Week One: 10:45 a.m. Get campers out of bed, if they want to, or get one of their life-partners out of the bed, if they want to, or suggest quietly that if they want something from the chowhall, one of them might consider ordering-in, without disturbing the others who might be enjoying their particular forms of self-fulfillment. 3:00 p.m. For those campers who are out of bed, offer the opportunity to watch the Michael Moore video "Conservatives Are On Earth To Test Our Patience And Longsuffering, But That Doesn't Mean We Have To Like Them". Provide a dance-interpretive substitute for the video for the campers who are out of bed and want the information but don't believe in exploiting cathode rays. 6:00 p.m. Pledge to the Arctic Tundra and peace-sign wave, mandatory participation for campers who are out of bed and want to participate. Instruct participants that peace signs should be faced in the direction of the UCLA campus, if that can be determined without using animal by-products or wooden objects. 10:00 p.m. Offer campers who are out of bed or are thinking about getting out of bed the opportunity to change bed linens along with swapping-out users of the linens. Week Two: 4:00 p.m. Any campers who are out of bed and want to, may meet in the solarium for soy chili and greeting card-making. Note, Tuesday and Thursday will be for making Hugo Chavez and Citgo Oil let's-be-friends cards, and Monday, Wednesday, Friday and the remainder of Tuesday and Thursday will be Republicans-are-the-Anti-Christ-if-you-believe-in-the-Anti-Christ posters, cards, banners and hemp manufactured T-shirts. Exit only | |||
|
Member |
Wearing fur would not be a platform plank anyway because both sides agree it is acceptable. Both sides wear fur coats. The democrats, thanks to their party plank on premarital sex, just don't wear anything under the fur coat. | |||
|
Administrator Member |
quote: Now I understand why they're called political "parties" -- where do I sign up? | |||
|
Administrator Member |
OK, now that this post is getting totally off-topic, I might as well steer it off the cliff by thowing in this quote I just saw: "Bush is having trouble with his generals. My man Clinton had trouble with his privates." -- Democratic consultant James Carville, talking about the current president and his predecessor at a dinner for Dallas Democrats, as reported in The Dallas Morning News In the eternal words of Larry the Cable Guy: "Now that there is FUNNY, I don't care who you are ..." | |||
|
Member |
I really don't think this Gallup Poll will have any impact on the Supreme's opinion regarding death penalty politics and atmosphere until there is a followup explaining the European prospective as well as supplemental commentary by the UN. The fur coat undergarment comment reminded me of that Judge who was entertaining himself while on the bench. Where was he from? the one where the court reporter's audio picked up the 'wooshing' noise? | |||
|
Administrator Member |
Gee, even Phillip couldn't stay on track for more than a paragraph ... this thread must be jinxed or possessed or something! | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.