Administrator Member
| quote: Originally posted by EJF: I think 33.07(b) also works
How so? "Spoofing" under (b) involves sending a message to another person; that is not what the ex-husband did. If it's anything, I would think it is an impersonation case under (a). As for whether Craigslist = a "commercial social networking site" as defined by (f), I think it's doubtful, but I'm not that familiar with Craigslist. |
| |
Administrator Member
| quote: Originally posted by EJF: (b) doesn't state that the electronic communication has to be sent to a specific person (that you can articulate), just that an electronic communication be sent including the personal information.
Actually, (b) says it applies to "an electonic mail, instant message, text message, or similar communication." These messages are all point-to-point or person-to-person communications that require the initiator of the message to know and select the recipient(s) address or identifier. The same is not done on a message board or on Craigslist. I think that may be an important distinction. |
| |
Administrator Member
| FWIW, there appears to be some social networking aspects to the personal ads on Craigslist, so I could see this case going forward under (a) if the facts merit it. Let's see what Bexar County can do with it! |
| |