Def was acquitted on the felony strangulation. He was also charged with an interference with a 911 call misdemeanor. we were shocked def was acquitted on the felony. and we would still like a conviction on the interference, which actually happened just before the strangulation--i mean JUST before. The defense argues the assault and acquittal on the felony are relevant to my misdemeanor case. But I say, why? It seems to me that we could have some success on this 911 call case with a jury if we can keep all the other out. Thoughts?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Dee Belknap,