SCOTUS has granted review in a Missouri case to decided if Schmerber meant what it said: that warrantless blood draws are reasonable because the delay associated with obtaining a warrant leads to destruction of the evidence (alcohol).

Details.

Any guesses how this one comes out? [Keep in mind that Missouri took the fairly radical approach of trying to narrow the meaning of Schmerber and suppressed the warrantless blood draw. Kind of suggests the answer, doesn't it?]