Member
| First, qualified immunity typically will cover most discretionary, "official duty" situations not encompassed by absolute prosecutorial immunity. If the arrangement is reasonably necessary to procure evidence, there's a good chance that qualified immunity may be available should something go wrong. Since contracting with CIs isn't traditionally associated with a prosecutor's advocacy function in court, though, I think prosecutorial immunity will be an iffy proposition. On the other hand, if it's an immunity agreement with the CI you're talking about, it may be a closer call. Still, making agreements and gathering evidence are functions the courts tend to categorize as outside the advocacy function.
Second, neither the Fifth Circuit nor the U.S. Supreme Court have officially signed off on the "state-created danger" theory of liability under section 1983.
Whether the particular contract is advisable would be difficult to evaluate without knowing its provisions. |
| Posts: 1233 | Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA | Registered: March 15, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| I am never a party to a CI contract. However, i get a written (usually) update on work/cases the CI has done. We do not follow the "if you do X# of felony cases then your case will be reduced to (fill in the blank)" type of contracts. CI's are to do the most they can and then i'll evaluate their work and rec my case accordingly. |
| |