Member
| |
| Posts: 2138 | Location: McKinney, Texas, USA | Registered: February 15, 2001 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt="Edit or Delete Message Edit or Delete Message"
IP
|
|
Member
| The charge used in our case involving this limitation read as follows: "The use of force against another is not justified if the actor sought an explanation from or a discussion with the other person concerning the actor's differences with the other person while the actor was knowingly carrying a handgun on or about his person and he is not on his own premises or premises under his control. * * * If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was seeking an explanation from or discussion with _____ while he was knowingly carrying a handgun on or about his person and he was not on his own premises or premises under his control, then you must find against the defendant on the issue of self-defense." See also Fink, 97 S.W.3d at 743; Rogers, No. 06-03-166-CV (10-1-04). |
| |