Member
| Elected officals' salaries may be adjusted during the annual budgeting process. The constraints on the commissioners court's discretion are two: the salaries must be reasonable (they must not amount to a budgetary abolishment of the office) and the must be no lower than salaries in effect in 1973 (I think, without looking at the applicable statutes). Also, an aggrieved elected offical may take his/her claim to the salary grievance committee. If the committee unanimously recommends a salary higher than that set by the commissioners court, the committee's recommendation is binding and must be included in the budget. As a practical matter, salaries that reflect the duties of the office and the office's workload (and exceed minimum wage) have been viewed by some courts, and the AG, as reflective of an adequate exercise of reason and discretion by the commissioners court. I could cite you a bunch of cases and AG opinions (we're currently up on appeal on a constable's salary mandamus suit), but the above discussion summarizes it all. If you would like the brief (as background), give me a call, e-mail me or fax me. |
| Posts: 1233 | Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA | Registered: March 15, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| What about the auditor? Since the auditor is appointed by district judges, does that lock the auditor in for the entire two years? |
| |