Member
| When we were faced with the same threat, I reminded our Sheriff that he / his department would be required to enforce the ordinance....so it made sense that permitting should come through him. He agreed...with noises about additional personnel!
Lisa L. Peterson Nolan County Attorney
|
| Posts: 736 | Location: Sweetwater TX | Registered: January 30, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| We have gone the other way on this issue. The permit applications are available in our county judge's office, and we require consideration of the permit application in an open meeting of the commissioners court. We chose that route for a couple of reasons. First, it insulates the sheriff's department from responsibility (and asserted liability) for the quasi-judicial decisionmaking process; they can instead focus on enforcement. Second, as these inevitably become public relations circuses/fiascos, and though some are inclined to grandstand a bit, the glare of the camera lights generally keeps the pontification to a dull roar. Though our regulations currently don't require it, I would give some thought to requiring the applicant to personally appear at the hearing to share in the gumdrops and rainbows that can't help but accompany such events. It should go without saying that a commissioner (or sheriff, if you go that way) stands to benefit from a little pre-hearing woodshedding on First Amendment law and the need for some sort of rational basis beyond NIMBY for adverse action on the application or excessive haranguing of the applicant. |
| Posts: 1233 | Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA | Registered: March 15, 2001 |
IP
|
|