Member
| Blanket rules indeed have shortcomings in First Amendment cases. Different types of property will be subject to differing analyses based on what kind of forum they are (traditional public forum, designated public forum, limited forum, not a forum). History is a necessary lens through which to view the issue. For instance, if the courthouse square has historically been used for public speech and debate, an abrupt outright ban will probably face strict scrutiny and likely fall short with respect to the compelling interest and narrow tailoring requisites. A neutral time place and manner restriction (designed to minimize damage and prevent interference with courthouse functions) will be much more likely to pass muster. The existence of other monuments or other forms of speech also plays into the mix, as allowing extant speech but disallowing future speech may raise a question of viewpoint discrmination, even if the ban is uniform in its prospective operation. Other county property may be subject to a much different review regimen, though. If the property is a limited forum, for instance, it may properly be limited to the selected permissible users, so long as the criteria are viewpoint neutral. A non forum is subject to an even more lenient reasonableness standard.
All of those issues are heavily reliant upon the historical and intended uses of the property. |
| Posts: 1233 | Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA | Registered: March 15, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| The posts about time, place, and content are all good. SCOTUS had held that a broad, evenhanded ban of signage on city public property is not unconstitutional, and I think the Court's reasoning would apply to a county ordinance, resolution, or policy. 466 US 789 (1984). |
| |
Member
| ONE thing I'm thankful for....when our poor (yes, it's still black w/ green tape, leaks and...) courthouse was built, they didn't leave ROOM for a lawn! The best you can do with a political sign is put it on a car in the parking lot, which is sufficiently removed from the Clerk's office which is the early voting location!
Lisa L. Peterson Nolan County Attorney
|
| Posts: 736 | Location: Sweetwater TX | Registered: January 30, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| My Comm. Ct. wants to ban all unauthorized signs from county property, primarily the courthouse lawn. Considering valuable past input from this forum, I have drafted the attached proposed ordinance and would greatly appreciate any feedback. Thanks from a Newbie. SIGN_ORDINANCE_BLANCO_COUNTY.docx (17 Kb, 20 downloads) proposed ordinance |
| |
Member
| There are only unusual promotion activities are ban in our county and no ban for political signs. ____________________ buy political signs |
| Posts: 5 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: June 21, 2013 |
IP
|
|