Member
| Are you trying to collect attorney's fees?
If (as I suspect) you're trying to defend against a claim for attorney's fees, a plea to the jurisdiction would seem appropriate, as neither chapter 59 nor article 18.18 provide any explicit or necessarily implied waiver of sovereign (since the State is the plaintiff) immunity. The Reata Constr. Co. rationale (if the governmental entity is seeking affirmative relief, immunity is waived to the extent the claim would act as an offset to the government's claim) would not seem to apply, since a forfeiture action proceeds in rem against the property, and the court would not properly "offset" attorney's fees from it. Property is either contraband or it isn't. If it is, it is subject to complete forfeiture. And that would mean that the claimant lost, so how would he/she be entitled to attorney's fees? If it isn't, the property is returned. It's not a money damages judgment.
It would also be appropriate to posit a special exception for failure to state a claim, since attorney's fees are not awardable in the absence of statutory or contractual authorization. No such authority exists in chapter 59 or article 18.18 (other than in favor of the AG in an enforcement suit for violation of the property disposition provisions of chapter 59; see CCP art. 59.062(d)). |
| Posts: 1233 | Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA | Registered: March 15, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| Anyone have an answer to a motion for summary judgment which request attorney's fees in a forfeiture action that they would be willing to share |
| |