Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
No request for attorney - but magistrate did not advise juvi of the procedures for indigent apptd atty. Under 51.102, art 26.04 applies as practicable - which incorp 15.17. But admissibility of juvi's stmt under 51.095 does not require the same as 15.17. Believe that 51.095 is all that is required for admissiblity of stmt - but need to respond to MTS legal memo applying 15.17 and Rothgery. Any thoughts other than Fam Code applies to stmt? | ||
|
Administrator Member |
The new SCOTUS opinion in Montejo may have made that question moot; be sure to read up on it before filing your answer. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.