TDCAA
TDCAA Community
Appellate
Inmates subject to interrogation may not be subject to "custodial" interrogation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt="Hop To Forum Categories Hop To Forum Categories"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt=""
Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
More on this in the forthcoming case summaries this week. But, today, the SCOTUS held (6-3)that simply because in inmate is questioned does not automatically mean the inmate is subject to custodial interrogation such that he must receive Miranda warnings before any statement will be admissible. The language used in summoning the inmate and the manner in which he is interrogated are crucial. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-680.pdf | ||
|
Member |
We already had a similar case in Texas, but it's nice to see the Supremes agree with us. ![]() | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
TDCAA
TDCAA Community
Appellate
Inmates subject to interrogation may not be subject to "custodial" interrogation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt="Hop To Forum Categories Hop To Forum Categories"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e1/401e1354d49559dbad327a78f250f48e0d46b12e" alt=""
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.