Does Tex.R.App.P. 18.1(a) authorize issuance of a mandate where a PDR was timely filed and a motion under Tex.R.App.P. 79 was filed within 15 days after the order denying the PDR was entered? The motion for rehearing arguably failed to comply with Rule 79.2(c), but was apparently overruled on the merits on November 2. It appears to me that none of the time periods described in the rule are ever going to exist (or expire) in this case. No one has had to answer this question before?

[This message was edited by Martin Peterson on 11-08-05 at .]