Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Tools ![]() |
RE:
PC hearing -- what's at issue? (in Criminal) by JimbeauxJust to make it clear, judge finds no PC, State moves to dismiss on that basis. And, yeah, no jeopar...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal PC hearing -- what's at issue? (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI'm kinda curious. How many see misdemeanor judges having hearing on probable cause (under 15.17) to...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Traffic Stop Question (in Criminal) by JimbeauxDoesn't this case answer this situation?: State v. Montano, 2013 WL 3518202 at *3 (Tex. App.--Corpus...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Motion to Suppress (in Criminal) by Jimbeaux268 S.W.3d 544... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Saving a Recorded Confession (in Criminal) by JimbeauxYeah, that doesn't sound good. It seems if it's error for just ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Defendant as a rebuttal witness (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI'm not sure I understand why that should be. What magical thing has happened at trial that has obli...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Defendant as a rebuttal witness (in Criminal) by JimbeauxThe more I think about this stuff, the less I think the Fifth Amendment has to do with it. Say, for ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Defendant as a rebuttal witness (in Criminal) by JimbeauxHere's another semi-useless, unpublished case -- this time federal... Barnum v. Calderon, No. CIV S...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford and Protective Orders (in Criminal) by JimbeauxNo -- its admission is not dependent on whether he testifies. As the statement of a party-opponent, ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford and Protective Orders (in Criminal) by JimbeauxAdmission of a defendant's statement can't be a Confrontation Clause violation. ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Necessity of Separate Warrant for Forensic Evaluation of Electronics (in Criminal) by JimbeauxThat doesn't sound like a very successful argument. US v. Upham, 168 F.3d 532, 536 (1st Cir. 1999)...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Opening the door during cross-examination (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI think that would be tough. See Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 183 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Theft as Lesser of Burglary? (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI think it depends on if the stolen item was described in the indictment. There's an explanation in ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Online Impersonation (in Criminal) by JimbeauxOh, please, for the love of God, don't lock it. I wanna hear Molly's First Amendment arguments justi...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
DNA swabs at booking (in Criminal) by JimbeauxJust FYI: ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
DNA swabs at booking (in Criminal) by JimbeauxWell, yeah, except the issue here is that Maryland takes the sample and runs it through CODIS to fin...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Improved shoulder?? (in Criminal) by JimbeauxDoes it matter what the officer's stated reason is? If the facts actually show failure to maintain a...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Cases (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI think there is zero problem with regard to the meter reader being on the property. See Garcia v. S...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Turn OFF the Phone (in Criminal) by JimbeauxOh, I didn't think you endorsed such a solution. My whine was based on an expectation that that sort...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Turn OFF the Phone (in Criminal) by JimbeauxGreat. A typically big-government, sledgehammer solution to a thumbtack problem.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.

