Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Tools ![]() |
RE:
DA Stands Tall (in Criminal) by JimbeauxIn context, the gentleman from Travis County seemed to be telling Chris Hansen that venue would be p...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Sufficiency of the Evidence (in Appellate) by JimbeauxI can think of situations where the State would make a tactical concession of factual insufficiency ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Passenger Can Challenge PC for Stop (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI don't see much of a problem with this, and it's certainly not worth fighting over. Members of the...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Capital cases: Atkins, Briseno, and federal implications (in Appellate) by JimbeauxCan someone articulate how Briseno conflicts with Atkins? Doesn't Briseno just interpret and fill in...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Affidavits Required for Responses to IAC Claims on Habeas? (in Appellate) by JimbeauxHowever you say it, it sounds more like "waiter". As in, "Yes, Your Honor, may I take your order?"... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Affidavits Required for Responses to IAC Claims on Habeas? (in Appellate) by JimbeauxI'm gonna jump in. I think David's first point is well-taken: the way current writ practice proceed...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Signing traffic ticket with false name (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI don't get failure to ID in this case. Hasn't he already handed over his true license? Doesn't that...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Admission of 911 tape (in Criminal) by JimbeauxHearsay wasn't the focus of my post. The Confrontation Clause was. And it's because they're "two sep...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Admission of 911 tape (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI think it's possible for a 911 tape made about a drunk driver could survive a confrontation clause ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
New US Suprem Court case -- Georgia v. Randolph (in Criminal) by JimbeauxThe problem is that we've jettisoned a bright line rule for one that isn't so bright. It would be mo...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
New US Suprem Court case -- Georgia v. Randolph (in Criminal) by JimbeauxJohn, it probably would have changed the analysis, but I think that makes the opinion even less defe...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
New US Suprem Court case -- Georgia v. Randolph (in Criminal) by JimbeauxWhile I wouldn't characterize the opinion as "offensive", I do think it odd that it is now constitut...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
HB 823 -- "Traveling" (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI think that advice is sound -- mainly because it's difficult to think of situations where (when the...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
HB 823 -- "Traveling" (in Criminal) by JimbeauxThe problem is that it ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Enhancing the Enhanced Offense for Evading w/Motor Vehicle (in Criminal) by JimbeauxWell, you have a good point about referring to sec. 49.09 (which coincidentally is called "enhanced ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Enhancing the Enhanced Offense for Evading w/Motor Vehicle (in Criminal) by Jimbeaux...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.

