Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
SCOTUS: Confrontation cl NOT violated (in Appellate) by David Newell I actually long for the days of Ohio v. Roberts. Thanks Tony. But does this make anything worse? ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
SCOTUS: Confrontation cl NOT violated (in Appellate) by David NewellIf only it were that simple . . .... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Nontesting Experts (in Criminal) by David NewellI think so because her opinion would be sufficiently independent rather than a mere scrivener under ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Ten Cases Every New Prosecutor Should Read (in Criminal) by David NewellIn an effort to show some love to our own court of last resort, and in line with Phil's nod to Terry...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Manner and Means Unknown post Sanchez (in Criminal) by David NewellI actually scanned through the opinion to see if I could find the word "unknowable" in the opinion b...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellA victory for justice and common sense! ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellHey, I don't want to be arguing for a retroactive application. And I agree, just because a few cour...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellDon't know that it is as they jettisoned Ohio v. Roberts or part of it in Crawford. In Padilla they...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellAre we really depending on Verrilli? Do we need an organized effort to file amicus . . . amicuses ....... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellWhat Court have you been watching? SCOTUS doesn't do that. They throw things out and tell the stat...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Padilla retroactivity to be considered by Supreme Court (in Appellate) by David NewellWow. I thought it was a closer call than that. If this weren't funneled through the well-establish...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
"WEASEL WORDS" IN FOF (in Appellate) by David NewellThat's going to be a thing, isn't it? Is stating the officer's belief was objectively reasonable a ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Minor furnishing alcohol to other minor? (in Juvenile Law) by David NewellI didn't find any cases dealing with juveniles and furnishing alcohol, but Lopez v. State, 108 S.W.3...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Juvenile Law
RE:
SCOTUS Skinner opens door to sec. 1983 DNA relief (in Criminal) by David NewellOr Melendez-Diaz.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
SCOTUS Skinner opens door to sec. 1983 DNA relief (in Criminal) by David NewellI agree. But I suppose there's an argument that the financial burden may not end up being too great...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
SCOTUS Skinner opens door to sec. 1983 DNA relief (in Criminal) by David NewellBut will the floodgates really be thrown open by a dwindling number of death sentences in this new l...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
You Can't Make This Up (in Criminal) by David NewellWhilst playing a banjo.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
CROSS APPEALS (in Appellate) by David NewellThen I must not be a vampire, because I never found civil as appealing as criminal law. Though I do...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 63 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
