Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
Prosecutor as a Witness??? (in Criminal) by Martin Peterson While not directly applicable, because you are not the attorney of record in the fee dispute case, 2...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Evidence (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI assume your concern is under rule 403. If you can prove the judgment pertains to the defendant and...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Evidence (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThe stipulation (admission by party opponent) should be admissible if the defendant testifies, as pr...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Discovery (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonTo me, you comply with a discovery request by producing the material described in the statute. It ma...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Testimonial Statements and Lack of Confrontation (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAnyone relying on outcry statements as proof of child abuse may want to be familiar with the oral ar...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Question on Passenger Standing if the driver has warrants (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonBe sure to clarify whether the challenge is to the temporary detention (traffic stop), or a search a...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonThe meaning of rule 21.3(h) may be clarified by the decision in ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonRe: this week's CCA decision on the meaning of TRAP 21.8, the commentator says, "what happens if the...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Appeal Help -- Restitution Not Included in Oral Sentence (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonIt would be hard to change the ruling in Taylor, 131 S.W.3d 497. And, I agree the courts have held t...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Testimonial Immunity (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonGraham v State, 994 S.W.2d 651, 655-56 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999): "Though a procedure for the granting o...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford and Protective Orders (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonTestimony at a suppression hearing is inadmissible later for an entirely different reason (having no...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Core Work Product & case declined (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAnother common ground for quashing a subpoena duces tecum is stated in Luvano v. State, 183 S.W.3d 9...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Core Work Product & case declined (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonUnder what provision was the application for subpoena requested/issued? If there was no pending crim...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Ethics opinion 646 (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI suppose each office will have to adopt its own understanding of the MMA. I believe, however, that ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Public Intoxication (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonMany PI cases have been prosecuted on the theory that an intoxicated person merely threatening to op...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Immunity for witness (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonFirst post more than four years after registering, what have you been waiting for? ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Prospective Juror Misconduct (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonYou cannot prove a false voir dire response was made by what a juror says during deliberations. ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
res judicata? (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonWhether it falls under the head of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case, I would ju...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
2013-2015 Charging Manual (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI recently wrote this in a case where the appellant alleged that there was a failure of proof becaus...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 121 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
