Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
Suppression hearing statute (in Criminal) by Martin Peterson In support of what I said: "in a pre-trial motion to suppress hearing, a trial court may rely upon ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Suppression hearing statute (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonMy immediate impression is that the statute says "may determine," not "must determine." "Only" is al...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonSince the opinion is not published, ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonThe meaning of rule 21.3(h) may be clarified by the decision in ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonRe: this week's CCA decision on the meaning of TRAP 21.8, the commentator says, "what happens if the...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate Ehrke (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThis is a useful opinion about the true meaning of Ake and appointment of experts and independent dr...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Former prosecutors - interested in amicus brief? (in Civil) by Martin PetersonAlthough practical considerations can come into play, it seems quite likely that the order of the CC...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Civil
RE:
NCIC Copies to Defense (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonOf course, a petition for writ of mandamus may not provide any relief either. See ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
NCIC Copies to Defense (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonWhy not contact them for the answer? As an alternative, you might assume that the exclusive means o...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Confession Issue (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI am guessing that the judge agreed that there was probable cause for the arrest. It would seem to m...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Prosecutor as a Witness??? (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonWhile not directly applicable, because you are not the attorney of record in the fee dispute case, 2...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Testimonial Statements and Lack of Confrontation (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAnyone relying on outcry statements as proof of child abuse may want to be familiar with the oral ar...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Question on Passenger Standing if the driver has warrants (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonBe sure to clarify whether the challenge is to the temporary detention (traffic stop), or a search a...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Appeal Help -- Restitution Not Included in Oral Sentence (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonIt would be hard to change the ruling in Taylor, 131 S.W.3d 497. And, I agree the courts have held t...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Testimonial Immunity (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonGraham v State, 994 S.W.2d 651, 655-56 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999): "Though a procedure for the granting o...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
court admonishments - waivers of counsel (in Criminal) by Martin Peterson1.051 (f-1) prohibits communication only "with a defendant who has requested the appointment of coun...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford and Protective Orders (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonTestimony at a suppression hearing is inadmissible later for an entirely different reason (having no...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Core Work Product & case declined (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAnother common ground for quashing a subpoena duces tecum is stated in Luvano v. State, 183 S.W.3d 9...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Core Work Product & case declined (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonUnder what provision was the application for subpoena requested/issued? If there was no pending crim...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 120 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
