Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
44.01(a)(5) and Findings (in Appellate) by Martin Peterson Are you saying that if the court were required to enter findings when contemplating ruling that rele...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate 44.01(a)(5) and Findings (in Appellate) by Martin Peterson...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Rental Agreement (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI think the topic was discussed in ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Pre-trial Diversion (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI know some have taken the position that pre-trial diversion is best used prior to filing of an info...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford help? (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI guess it is pretty obvious the accessory's prior statement is likely testimonial hearsay. Gutierr...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
CSHB 1759 (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThe bill is now on its way to the local and uncontested calendar for Senate Floor action. Beware tha...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
CSHB 1759 (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonWarren, no one disputes that the original bill would have been salutary and that the current law doe...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
CSHB 1759 (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThe opportunity for the issues I raised to be discussed in the Senate committee came on May 3. I was...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
CSHB 1759 (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonOf course, the "mandatory drug offender probation" people argue that even though the jury sentences ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
CSHB 1759 (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThe bill passed on a voice vote today by the House (without amendment) on Third Reading, so focus yo...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
SOL Tolling Question (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonExcept for the continuing nature of some offenses (which modifies "the date of the commission of the...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Recusal/Special Prosecutor (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonThe appeal is a separate proceeding. Thus, in my opinion a prior order under either art. 2.07(a) of ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Crawford question (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAs I understand ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Factual sufficiency? Help! (in Criminal) by Martin Peterson...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Missing Evidence (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonMaybe Texas should adopt the so-called Stevens exception to the requirement that bad faith be shown ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
14 year old habeas corpus (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonWe can only assume that the same burdens imposed by such cases as ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Who controls docket in Constitutional County Court? (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonArt. 33.08 seems pretty clear.... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Texas, too? (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAt the very least, the States should have the right to impose something similar to a certificate of ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
SB 560--mandating discovery, is a disaster! (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThere will be a good bit of litigation concerning compliance with this statute and such things as ho...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
State's appeal righs (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI would have to say neither Rule 21 nor art. 44.01 apply to your situation. Thus, your choices are t...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 120 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
