Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
controlled substances question (in Criminal) by Martin Peterson I am guessing Texas law will conform to (require no more knowledge or intent than) federal law, whic...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
controlled substances question (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI think you cite the only language the Texas courts have used in describing the elements of the offe...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Ehrke (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThis is a useful opinion about the true meaning of Ake and appointment of experts and independent dr...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Former prosecutors - interested in amicus brief? (in Civil) by Martin PetersonAlthough practical considerations can come into play, it seems quite likely that the order of the CC...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Civil
RE:
Evidence (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonJay, given the propensities of the system maybe nothing has happened yet; but, if and when you or th...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Evidence (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonI assume your concern is under rule 403. If you can prove the judgment pertains to the defendant and...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Evidence (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThe stipulation (admission by party opponent) should be admissible if the defendant testifies, as pr...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Prosecutor as a Witness??? (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonWhile not directly applicable, because you are not the attorney of record in the fee dispute case, 2...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Testimonial Statements and Lack of Confrontation (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAnyone relying on outcry statements as proof of child abuse may want to be familiar with the oral ar...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonThe meaning of rule 21.3(h) may be clarified by the decision in ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate Commentary on Kirk (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonRe: this week's CCA decision on the meaning of TRAP 21.8, the commentator says, "what happens if the...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
Appeal Help -- Restitution Not Included in Oral Sentence (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonIt would be hard to change the ruling in Taylor, 131 S.W.3d 497. And, I agree the courts have held t...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
court admonishments - waivers of counsel (in Criminal) by Martin Peterson1.051 (f-1) prohibits communication only "with a defendant who has requested the appointment of coun...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford and Protective Orders (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonTestimony at a suppression hearing is inadmissible later for an entirely different reason (having no...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Core Work Product & case declined (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonAnother common ground for quashing a subpoena duces tecum is stated in Luvano v. State, 183 S.W.3d 9...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Core Work Product & case declined (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonUnder what provision was the application for subpoena requested/issued? If there was no pending crim...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal Prospective Juror Misconduct (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonYou cannot prove a false voir dire response was made by what a juror says during deliberations. ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
res judicata? (in Appellate) by Martin PetersonWhether it falls under the head of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law of the case, I would ju...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate Ford vs. Samaripas (in Criminal) by Martin PetersonThe correct result was reached in ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 120 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
