Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Tools ![]() |
![]() It shouldn't make the argument stronger: "we take this opportunity to emphasize that the summary re...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate ![]() The CCA posts all of the granted issues on ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate ![]() I had a capital case where the NOA was filed in Nov 1986 and the mandate issued in Nov 1996. ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate ![]() The issue, I guess, is whether the defendant had the car dealership's effective consent. Was it d...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() "To find operation under [the DWI] standard, the totality of the circumstances must demonstrate that...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() The hypno-toad from Futurama is strangely compelling. ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() Also, maybe no effective consent: (3) �Effective consent� includes consent by a person legally auth...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() "Courts have also applied the limitation of provoking the difficulty on the defense of third persons...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() Another theory for admission might be "preparation" or "plan." As Judge Cochran says: "if the defen...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() The new appellate rules (effective 9/1/08) are available at ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate ![]() First, I think that you can argue that the laser does not have to be shown to be accurate to justify...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate ![]() I had a case recently where the trial court instructed the jury under 9.31(b), the Waco didn't addre...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() You say they were interviewed separately, so the issue for the juvenile is whether he was in custody...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Juvenile Law ![]() Yes. 43 TXPRAC § 38.102 Adame v. State, 69 S.W.3d 581 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002). Shelton v. State,...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() Our secretaries use a product called "Full Authority" that they seem to like better than Word. I ju...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate ![]() So your point is that Medrano was wrongly decided: The trial court's ruling in this case does not i...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() Why is a motion to suppress that is based on a rule of evidence bogus: Under article 28.01, a moti...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() This case might help Hernandez v. State, 127 S.W.3d 768 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) ("The question befor...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() First, I would think -- assuming the co-defendant does not testify in your trial -- that it would vi...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal ![]() Alameda v. State, 235 S.W.3d 218, 224 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) ("We hold that the doctrine of vicariou...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 27 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.