TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Criminal    Psychologist Mitigation in Murder Case
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Psychologist Mitigation in Murder Case Login/Join 
Member
posted
Defense has obtained funds for a Psychologist to interview Defendant in an upcoming murder prosecution. Purportedly this is for mitigation of punishment because Defendant has "memory issues." Essentially pretty quickly after he shot his girlfriend in the head, he started telling friends and family that he had no memory of the crime. If defense wants expert to testify based upon hearsay interview with Defendant, does that State have the right to it's own psychologist to examine Defendant? Intern and I have researched and have come up empty regarding answer with reference to regular murder. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: February 19, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Consider hiring an expert of your own, not to examine the defendant, but to respond to the mitigation claims put forth by the defense expert. To me, questioning the opinions of the expert and debunking his theories is as or more important. File a motion to have your expert sit in the courtroom during the defense expert's testimony, so your expert can help you formulate topics and questions to cross the defense expert with.
 
Posts: 2578 | Location: The Great State of Texas | Registered: December 26, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Check out Lagrone and Soria. Defendant can't testify through an expert without your expert getting a chance. As it has been working, you may never get to hear what your expert has to say if the defense decides their expert isn't gonna testify.

The Lizard Man is innocent!
 
Posts: 2138 | Location: McKinney, Texas, USA | Registered: February 15, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I agree with John. I have adapted a LaGrone motion for use in a non-death capital, as well as for non-capital cases. So long as you keep your request within the parameters set forth in LaGrone - it's just for rebuttal, you don't get to see the report unless and until the defense expert testifies, etc., I think you'll be fine.
 
Posts: 280 | Registered: October 24, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
1. It is no defense to the crime - whether the def claims he has "loss of memery" refutes absolutely nothing in regard to the mental state at the time of the offense.
2. The "DSM" does not allow the diagnosis of "temporary amnesia" (forget the new psycho-babble term) if there is a pending criminal case.
3. Think about it - which is scarier - a man who kills his girlfriend by putting a bullet through her head and comes up with some frivolous reason why, or a man who can do such a despicable act,forget it, and then whine about it. Which one do you want out on the street?
 
Posts: 62 | Location: Richmond, Texas, USA | Registered: May 07, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
may have the effect of making the defense back off on having their expert do an examination, if the judge grants your motion, as the judge should. There is no reason to limit the application of the rulings to capital or even to murder.
 
Posts: 130 | Location: Texas | Registered: October 12, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Criminal    Psychologist Mitigation in Murder Case

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.