Member
| A couple of weeks ago, Judge Cochran wrote a great dissenting opinion in a case dealing with the Tamez-type stipulation. Read it and you will know what to do the next time this comes up. She also provides the procedure and wording for a stipulation. Go to: http://www.cca.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/130500d.htm#N_1_ |
| Posts: 7860 | Location: Georgetown, Texas | Registered: January 25, 2001 |
IP
|
|
Member
| The one thing Tamez and Robles must leave available is that where there are more than two priors alleged, the State gets to choose which two priors it will actually seek to prove. The defendant would naturally choose the two oldest ones to include in his stipulation. You should be able to force a stipulation to whichever two you choose. This is also a reason to continue to allege as many priors as there are. |
| |