Member
  | I suppose you are seeking assessment of punishment under Sec. 12.35 (c) is the reason for the separate allegation about a d/w.  Stewart, No. 10-00-62-CR (2/6/02) holds such a finding unnecessary, though implying it still might be the better practice.  Another reason would go like this: jury cannot consider probated sentence under 42.12 sec. 4(d)(2); nor can court grant suspension of sentence by virtue of sec. 3g (a)(2).  Note that authority of court under sec. 15(a) is only for a "state jail felony punished under Section 12.35(a), Penal Code."
   Won't the pretty standard issue work?  E.g., "Do you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that during the commission of the offense, if you have found such offense was committed, that Defendant used or exhibited a deadly weapon as defined herein?"  | 
|   |  |