TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Criminal    Name That Offense
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Name That Offense Login/Join 
Member
posted
Campbell illustrates that we must carefully listen to what the judge is saying when sentence is being pronounced. Is there a way around this problem? Should the judge just say something like "I find you guilty of the offense charged in the indictment"? I think the Chief Justice more accurately described the decision intended by the trial judge. IMO phraseology should not be the main determinant of the punishment. Maybe the CCA will agree.

[This message was edited by Martin Peterson on 03-11-07 at .]
 
Posts: 2386 | Registered: February 07, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
We agree with the Chief Justice - we will see what happens on PDR.

Of course we know that the trial judge was just making a mistake in phraseology but we can't go outside the record. Everyone knew what was happening - especcially in light of the extensive admonishment regarding punishment. It was clear the trial court knew this was a third degree enhanced with priors, but he erred in calling it a state jail (because of the amount).
 
Posts: 419 | Location: Abilene, TX USA | Registered: December 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Criminal    Name That Offense

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.