Have a suppression hearing in a burglary case. D calls about a break-in to his home. Officers begin asking him about what happened and all of a sudden D invokes his right to counsel. He was not a suspect. Officers continued to question the D which brought about some inconsistencies. Can anyone point to some caselaw that will help?
Thanks

5th: See,e.g., Brossette v. S., 99 SW3d 277 (Texarkana 2003, pet ref'd untimely filed)

6th: Pecina v. S., 268 SW3d 564 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)

Thanks John, exactly what I need!