Go  ![]()  | New  ![]()  | Find  ![]()  | Notify  ![]()  | Tools  ![]()  | Reply  ![]()  |    | 
| Member | 
 Got a guy indicted for burg/bldg.  Have prior felonies (not state jail felonies) from 1993 & 1990 to enhance.  Also have two other non-SJF felony priors from 1990 and one non-SJF prior from 1989. All are alleged sequentially in the indictment. Is his punishment range still only 2-20 TDC? Or can we go higher by using the other 3 priors?  | ||
  | 
| Member | 
 Once an offense is enhanced under 12.42(a)(2) to a second degree felony you have arrived at the final resting spot. Webb, 12 S.W.3d 808.  | |||
  | 
| Member | 
 Thank you!  I guess we're just wasting ink when we allege all their priors, huh?  | |||
  | 
| Member | 
 Not if it saves a trial.  If by listing the enhancements it convinces the defendant to plea instead of face the max from a jury it's not a waste in my opinion.  | |||
  | 
| Member | 
 It can also serve as notice for other purposes, i.e. 37.07, and may save you if one of your principal priors develops a defect, e.g. non-comparable fingerprints or a writ.  | |||
  | 
| Member | 
 Y'all are right and that's exactly why I spell out every single stinkin' prior I can find in my indictments - just in case one's bad, or void, or something. A judge has griped about the huge amount of material in the indictments, but hey, it's the best way to put defendant on notice, huh?  | |||
  | 
| Powered by Social Strata | 
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... | 
  | 
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.

