Member
| Props to Angela Goodwin in our office for her work on that case - both at trial and on appeal. Great work!
And this area of the law does make for some interesting indictments. As I mentioned at the Crimes Against Children conference, I recently walked in on two of our lawyers (Angela being one of them) involved in a deep conversation about the best way to allege a "strap on" in a child pornography indictment.
Not too long after that, we spent a fair amount of time trying to come up with language in an Online Solicitation indictment to replace the defendant's "I want to do XXXXX to you and here's exactly how I'm gonna do it" talk.... We came up with something somewhat more tasteful and I rather doubt the defense will file a motion to quash for failure to give notice!
Not the type of creative charging that most of us envisioned when we got into this business! |
| |
Member
| More than once I've used language taken from www.adamandeve.com to use as a description of the 'device' employed in the misconduct. I always envisioned using the item advertisement description for the purposes of explaining the item's use and purpose. (I never got the chance to do it though, those cases always seem to plead out.) FYI: if you're going to check the link for the material, close your door. It might be difficult to explain to any passers by. [This message was edited by Philip D Ray on 07-31-08 at .] |
| Posts: 764 | Location: Dallas, Texas | Registered: November 04, 2003 |
IP
|
|
Member
| Sadly for me, Mr. McFeely (I spelled it wrong the first time) is not a made up moniker. He was an actual character on Mister Rogers' Neighborhood. It gets worse. He was also known as Speedy McFeely becuase he was a mailman. Here's the link. |
| Posts: 1243 | Location: houston, texas, u.s.a. | Registered: October 19, 2001 |
IP
|
|